|
|

Task
Force Report Outlines National Agenda on Newborn Screening
National
Center for Education in Maternal and Child Health
August 11, 2000
Back to Research Articles
The definition of comprehensive
newborn screening is changing rapidly, and state public health programs
may not be keeping up, according to an American Academy of Pediatrics
(AAP) Task Force on Newborn Screening report published as a supplement
to the journal Pediatrics. AAP convened the task force with funding from
and at the request of the Maternal and Child Health Bureau, Health Resources
and Services Administration. The report discusses specific recommendations
for program and policy development in the following four areas: 1) public
health infrastructure, 2) professional and consumer involvement, 3) surveillance
and research, and 4) economics of screening.
The report identifies the following
key issues:
- The need for all state newborn
screening systems to keep pace with new technology.
- The need for uniform screening
systems across states. All states screen for selected disorders, but
screening requirements vary. For example, only a few states screen for
cystic fibrosis, toxoplasmosis, or HIV, and only about half conduct
universal hearing screens.
- Ethical concerns surrounding
residual blood samples. In most cases enough blood remains after testing
to conduct repeat testing if necessary; this raises questions about
the ethics of using the blood for other purposes, including research.
- Privacy and consent issues.
Information for parents about screening varies. The report states that
parents have the right to be informed that their children will be screened
and the right to refuse screening.
- The need for public awareness.
Parents must be informed about 1) benefits and potential risks of newborn
screening tests and treatments, 2) policies for storage and use of specimens,
and 3) the mechanism by which they will receive test results.
The report also states that federal
and state public health agencies, in partnership with health professionals
and consumers, should continue to
- Better define federal and state
public health agencies' responsibilities;
- Develop and disseminate model
state regulations (including disease and test-selection criteria) to
guide the implementation of state newborn screening systems;
- Develop and evaluate innovative
testing technologies;
- Design and apply minimum standards
for newborn screening activities (e.g., sample collection, laboratory
quality, sample storage, and information systems);
- Develop and disseminate model
follow-up, diagnosis, and treatment guidelines and protocols for health
professionals and other participants in the newborn screening system;
- Design and evaluate model systems
of care that provide individuals of all ages with services that are
consistent with national guidelines for children with special health
care needs (i.e., family-centered, community-based, and coordinated
systems of care).
- Design and evaluate tools and
strategies that strive to effectively inform families and the general
public about newborn screening; and
- Fund demonstration projects
to evaluate technology, quality assurance, and health outcomes.
American Academy of Pediatrics.
2000, August 7. Newborn screening report addresses inconsistencies and
controversies. Press release available at http://www.aap.org/default.htm.
Serving the family from birth
to the medical home: Newborn screening: A blueprint for the future executive
summary: Newborn Screening Task Force report. August 2000. Pediatrics
106 (Suppl. 2):386-388.
To subscribe to the MCH Alert,
send an email message to MCHALERT@LIST.NCEMCH.ORG,
with SUBSCRIBE in the subject line. You do not need to enter any text
in the body of the message.
MCH Alert. 2001. Arlington, VA: National Center for Education in Maternal
and Child Health. http://www.ncemch.org/alert.
top
|